10.5555/3491440.3492057guideproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesConference Proceedingsacm-pubtype
research-article
Free Access

Task-based learning via task-oriented prediction network with applications in finance

Published:07 January 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

Real-world applications often involve domain-specific and task-based performance objectives that are not captured by the standard machine learning losses, but are critical for decision making. A key challenge for direct integration of more meaningful domain and task-based evaluation criteria into an end-to-end gradient-based training process is the fact that often such performance objectives are not necessarily differentiable and may even require additional decision-making optimization processing. We propose the Task-Oriented Prediction Network (TOPNet), an end-to-end learning scheme that automatically integrates task-based evaluation criteria into the learning process via a learnable surrogate loss function, which directly guides the model towards the task-based goal. A major benefit of the proposed TOPNet learning scheme lies in its capability of automatically integrating nondifferentiable evaluation criteria, which makes it particularly suitable for diversified and customized task-based evaluation criteria in real-world tasks. We validate the performance of TOPNet on two real-world financial prediction tasks, revenue surprise forecasting and credit risk modeling. The experimental results demonstrate that TOPNet significantly outperforms both traditional modeling with standard losses and modeling with handcrafted heuristic differentiable surrogate losses.

References

  1. Yoshua Bengio. Using a financial training criterion rather than a prediction criterion. International Journal of Neural Systems, 8(04):433-443, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Priya Donti, Brandon Amos, and J Zico Kolter. Task-based end-to-end model learning in stochastic optimization. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pages 5484-5494, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. M. Doumpos, C. Lemonakis, D. Niklis, and C. Zopounidis. Introduction to credit risk modeling and assessment. In In: Analytical Techniques in the Assessment of Credit Risk. EURO Advanced Tutorials on Operational Research, pages 1-21. Springer, Cham, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Adam N Elmachtoub and Paul Grigas. Smart" predict, then optimize". arXiv preprint arXiv:1710.08005, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Sepp Hochreiter and Jürgen Schmidhuber. Long short-term memory. Neural computation, 9(8):1735-1780, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Narasimhan Jegadeesh and Joshua Livnat. Revenue surprises and stock returns. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 41, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Yi-hao Kao, Benjamin V Roy, and Xiang Yan. Directed regression. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pages 889-897, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Diederik Kingma and Jimmy Ba. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Andrew Perrault, Bryan Wilder, Eric Ewing, Aditya Mate, Bistra Dilkina, and Milind Tambe. Decision-focused learning of adversary behavior in security games. arXiv preprint arXiv:1903.00958, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Marcos Lopez de Prado. Advances in Financial Machine Learning. Wiley, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Matthew Riemer, Aditya Vempaty, Flavio P. Calmon, Fenno F. Heath, III, Richard Hull, and Elham Khabiri. Correcting forecasts with multifactor neural attention. In Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on International Conference on Machine Learning - Volume 48, ICML'16, pages 3010-3019. JMLR.org, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Bryan Wilder, Bistra Dilkina, and Milind Tambe. Melding the data-decisions pipeline: Decision-focused learning for combinatorial optimization. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 33, pages 1658-1665, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Bryan Wilder, Eric Ewing, Bistra Dilkina, and Milind Tambe. End to end learning and optimization on graphs. arXiv preprint arXiv:1905.13732, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Hongxia Yang, Yada Zhu, and Jingrui He. Local algorithm for user action prediction towards display ads. In Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, KDD '17, pages 2091-2099, New York, NY, USA, 2017. ACM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

(auto-classified)
  1. Task-based learning via task-oriented prediction network with applications in finance

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image Guide Proceedings
          IJCAI'20: Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
          January 2021
          5311 pages
          ISBN:9780999241165

          Copyright © 2020 International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence

          Publisher

          Unknown publishers

          Publication History

          • Published: 7 January 2021

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed limited
        • Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)11
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3

          Other Metrics

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader
        About Cookies On This Site

        We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

        Learn more

        Got it!