Ian Foster
Skip Abstract Section
Abstract
The ability to share data is critical to reproducible research, yet data sharing is often limited because issues of findability, accessibility, interoperability, and reusability—the FAIR principles—are not integrated into every step of the scientific process.
- 1. , “Socio-technical systems: From design methods to systems engineering,”Interacting Comput., vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 4–17, 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.intcom.2010.07.003.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- 2. ., “Why linked data is not enough for scientists,”Future Gener. Comput. Syst., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 599–611, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.future.2011.08.004.Google ScholarDigital Library
- 3. , “An introduction to Docker for reproducible research,”ACM SIGOPS Oper. Syst. Rev., vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 71–79, 2015, doi: 10.1145/2723872.2723882.Google ScholarDigital Library
- 4. , “Experiences with DERIVA: An asset management platform for accelerating eScience,” in Proc. IEEE 13th Int. Conf. e-Science, 2017, pp. 79–88, doi: 10.1109/eScience.2017.20.Google Scholar
- 5. ., “I’ll take that to go: Big data bags and minimal identifiers for exchange of large, complex datasets,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Big Data, 2016, pp. 319–328, doi: 10.1109/BigData.2016.7840618.Google Scholar
- 6. ., “Methods included: Standardizing computational reuse and portability with the common workflow language,”2022, arXiv:2105.07028.Google Scholar
- 7. ., “Regional synapse gain and loss accompany memory formation in larval zebrafish,”Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., vol. 119, no. 3, p. e2107661119, 2022, doi: 10.1073/pnas.2107661119.Google Scholar
- 8. “Guiding principles for findable, accessible, interoperable and re-usable data publishing version B1.0,”Force11, San Diego, CA, USA, 2014. [Online]. Available: https://www.force11.org/fairprinciplesGoogle Scholar
- 9. , Writing the Laboratory Notebook. Washington, DC, USA: American Chemical Society, 1985.Google Scholar
- 10. , “The BagIt file packaging format (v1.0),”Internet Engineering Task Force, Fremont, CA, USA, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc8493/Google Scholar
- 11. ., “Reproducible big data science: A case study in continuous FAIRness,”PLoS ONE, vol. 14, no. 4, p. e0213013, 2019, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213013.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 12. ., “Experiences building Globus Genomics: A next-generation sequencing analysis service using Galaxy, Globus, and Amazon Web Services,”Concurrency Comput., Pract. Exp., vol. 26, no. 13, pp. 2266–2279, 2014, doi: 10.1002/cpe.3274.Google ScholarDigital Library
- 13. , “The rationale of PROV,”J. Web Semantics, vol. 35, pp. 235–257, Dec.2015, doi: 10.1016/j.websem.2015.04.001.Google ScholarDigital Library
- 14. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine.Reproducibility and Replicability in Science. Washington, DC, USA: National Academies Press, 2019.Google Scholar
- 15. , “Git can facilitate greater reproducibility and increased transparency in science,”Source Code Biology Med., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2013, doi: 10.1186/1751-0473-8-7.Google Scholar
- 16. , “A learning trajectory for ontology building,” in Proc. Annu. Knowl. Organizations Conf., 2005, pp. 1–43.Google Scholar
- 17. , “Ten simple rules for reproducible computational research,”PLoS Comput. Biol., vol. 9, no. 10, p. e1003285, 2013, doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003285.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 18. , “Towards co-evolution of data-centric ecosystems,” in Proc. 32nd Int. Conf. Scientific Statist. Database Manage., 2020, pp. 1–12, doi: 10.1145/3400903.3400908.Google ScholarDigital Library
- 19. ., “Packaging research artefacts with RO-Crate,”Data Sci., pp. 1–42, 2022, doi: 10.3233/DS-210053. https://content.iospress.com/articles/data-science/ds210053Google Scholar
- 20. ., “Data sharing practices and data availability upon request differ across scientific disciplines,”Scientific Data, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2021, doi: 10.1038/s41597-021-00981-0.Google Scholar
Index Terms
(auto-classified)CUF-Links: Continuous and Ubiquitous FAIRness Linkages for Reproducible Research
Comments